Rechercher dans ce blog

Sunday, December 31, 2023

What's open on New Year's Eve? Stores, restaurants and fast food places ringing in 2024 with open doors. - CBS News

Designing the iconic New Year's Eve ball

Master craftsman on designing the iconic New Year's Eve ball in Times Square 03:45

The arrival of New Year's Eve invariably brings a last-minute rush to grab a festive beverage or missing ingredient for a special meal. But before heading out, it's best to check whether your local grocer, restaurants or superstore like Walmart will be open. 

While many chains operate with regular business hours on New Year's Eve, others may close their doors early, so it's best to check ahead if you are in doubt.

What grocery stores are open on New Year's Eve?

Open with regular hours:

  • Albertsons: Stores are open with regular hours, but pharmacy hours may vary.
  • Big Y: Open regular hours.
  • Food Lion: Open regular hours.
  • H-E-B: Open regular hours.
  • 7-Eleven: Generally stores are open 24 hours, but some locations may vary. 

Closing early or limited hours:

  • ALDI: Stores are open with limited hours.
  • Kroger: Most locations will close early. The company recommends checking your local grocery for their exact hours.
  • Publix hours: The grocery chain said its locations will close at 9 p.m. on New Year's Eve. 
  • Stop & Shop: Stores close at 9 p.m. on New Year's Eve, while pharmacy hours are from  9 a.m. - 1 p.m.
  • Trader Joe's: Stores close at 5 p.m.
  • Giant Food: All stores will close at 9:00 pm.

What superstores are open on New Year's Eve?

Open regular hours:

  • Walmart: Open regular business hours.
  • Meijer: Stores are open from 6 a.m. until midnight.

Closes early or with limited hours:

  • Costco: Most stores will open at 8:30 a.m. and close at 5 p.m., but you should check your local warehouse hours. 
  • Lowe's: Stores close at 6 p.m.
  • Macy's: Stores will open at 10 a.m. and close at 7 p.m.
  • Target hours: A spokesperson said most Target stores will close at 9 p.m. on New Year's Eve. 

What restaurants are open on New Year's Eve?

Open regular hours:

  • Chili's: Open regular hours.
  • Cracker Barrel: All locations will be open during their normal business hours. 
  • Olive Garden: Open normal business hours, but the company recommends checking local restaurants in case there are "specific local activities that may affect hours of operating." 

Open, but may close early or operate with limited hours — best to check ahead.

  • Chipotle: Restaurants will close at 8 p.m. on New Year's Eve.
  • Dunkin': Most locations will be open, but hours may vary by location. The company recommends confirming their local store's hours online or via the Dunkin' mobile app
  • IHOP: Restaurants will be open, but hours of operation may vary, so customers should check with their local IHOP. 
  • Olive Garden: Will be open with regular business hours, but the company recommends checking nearby locations in case there are "specific local activities that may affect hours of operating." 
  • Starbucks: The chain said its hours will vary by location, so it recommends that customers use its app or visit its online store locator to check opening and closing times for specific stores.
  • Taco Bell: Most locations will be open New Year's Eve, but hours may vary. The company recommends checking on your local restaurant's hours. 

CLOSED

  • Chick-fil-A: All restaurants are closed on New Year's Eve.

What drug stores are open on New Year's Eve?

  • Walgreens: Walgreens stores will be open during regular business hours on New Year's Eve. Pharmacy hours vary by location, so the company recommends checking its store locator or by phone. All 24-hour locations will remain open 24 hours. 
  • Rite Aid: The chain will be open with regular hours.
  • CVS: Many locations will be open with regular hours, but some may be closed or operate with limited hours, a spokesperson said. The company recommends that customers call their local CVS or check for store hours online at cvs.com before visiting. 

—With reporting by the Associated Press.

Adblock test (Why?)


What's open on New Year's Eve? Stores, restaurants and fast food places ringing in 2024 with open doors. - CBS News
Read More

What's open on New Year's Eve? Stores, restaurants and fast food places ringing in 2024 with open doors. - CBS News

Designing the iconic New Year's Eve ball

Master craftsman on designing the iconic New Year's Eve ball in Times Square 03:45

The arrival of New Year's Eve invariably brings a last-minute rush to grab a festive beverage or missing ingredient for a special meal. But before heading out, it's best to check whether your local grocer, restaurants or superstore like Walmart will be open. 

While many chains operate with regular business hours on New Year's Eve, others may close their doors early, so it's best to check ahead if you are in doubt.

What grocery stores are open on New Year's Eve?

Open with regular hours:

  • Albertsons: Stores are open with regular hours, but pharmacy hours may vary.
  • Big Y: Open regular hours.
  • Food Lion: Open regular hours.
  • H-E-B: Open regular hours.
  • 7-Eleven: Generally stores are open 24 hours, but some locations may vary. 

Closing early or limited hours:

  • ALDI: Stores are open with limited hours.
  • Kroger: Most locations will close early. The company recommends checking your local grocery for their exact hours.
  • Publix hours: The grocery chain said its locations will close at 9 p.m. on New Year's Eve. 
  • Stop & Shop: Stores close at 9 p.m. on New Year's Eve, while pharmacy hours are from  9 a.m. - 1 p.m.
  • Trader Joe's: Stores close at 5 p.m.
  • Giant Food: All stores will close at 9:00 pm.

What superstores are open on New Year's Eve?

Open regular hours:

  • Walmart: Open regular business hours.
  • Meijer: Stores are open from 6 a.m. until midnight.

Closes early or with limited hours:

  • Costco: Most stores will open at 8:30 a.m. and close at 5 p.m., but you should check your local warehouse hours. 
  • Lowe's: Stores close at 6 p.m.
  • Macy's: Stores will open at 10 a.m. and close at 7 p.m.
  • Target hours: A spokesperson said most Target stores will close at 9 p.m. on New Year's Eve. 

What restaurants are open on New Year's Eve?

Open regular hours:

  • Chili's: Open regular hours.
  • Cracker Barrel: All locations will be open during their normal business hours. 
  • Olive Garden: Open normal business hours, but the company recommends checking local restaurants in case there are "specific local activities that may affect hours of operating." 

Open, but may close early or operate with limited hours — best to check ahead.

  • Chipotle: Restaurants will close at 8 p.m. on New Year's Eve.
  • Dunkin': Most locations will be open, but hours may vary by location. The company recommends confirming their local store's hours online or via the Dunkin' mobile app
  • IHOP: Restaurants will be open, but hours of operation may vary, so customers should check with their local IHOP. 
  • Olive Garden: Will be open with regular business hours, but the company recommends checking nearby locations in case there are "specific local activities that may affect hours of operating." 
  • Starbucks: The chain said its hours will vary by location, so it recommends that customers use its app or visit its online store locator to check opening and closing times for specific stores.
  • Taco Bell: Most locations will be open New Year's Eve, but hours may vary. The company recommends checking on your local restaurant's hours. 

CLOSED

  • Chick-fil-A: All restaurants are closed on New Year's Eve.

What drug stores are open on New Year's Eve?

  • Walgreens: Walgreens stores will be open during regular business hours on New Year's Eve. Pharmacy hours vary by location, so the company recommends checking its store locator or by phone. All 24-hour locations will remain open 24 hours. 
  • Rite Aid: The chain will be open with regular hours.
  • CVS: Many locations will be open with regular hours, but some may be closed or operate with limited hours, a spokesperson said. The company recommends that customers call their local CVS or check for store hours online at cvs.com before visiting. 

—With reporting by the Associated Press.

Adblock test (Why?)


What's open on New Year's Eve? Stores, restaurants and fast food places ringing in 2024 with open doors. - CBS News
Read More

Federal roadbuilding manual gets an update - NPR

Laura Keenan and her son, Evan, hold a photo of her late husband Matt Keenan, who was killed while riding his bike in San Diego in 2021. Courtesy of Laura Keenan

Courtesy of Laura Keenan

Matt Keenan was an experienced cyclist. He knew the best bike routes around San Diego, and bought the brightest lights for his bike.

None of that was enough to keep him alive.

Keenan was killed by a driver who crossed over the road's double yellow line and hit him head on in the opposite bike lane. His wife, Laura Keenan, found out the next morning.

"I then had to get my 15 month-old son out of bed and tell him that his dad was never coming home again," she said.

That was over two years ago. Since then, Laura Keenan has become an advocate for safer streets. She's convinced that a better road design would have made a difference for her husband.

"Oh, 100%," she said in an interview. "I'm confident that he'd be alive if there was a protected bikeway, or if the street was designed to prevent cars from going deadly speeds."

Traffic fatalities in the U.S. are up sharply since the beginning of the pandemic — especially for pedestrians and cyclists. That's bringing attention to a previously obscure federal manual that's sometimes called the Bible of road design.

Since 1935, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices has set national standards for street signs and road design, with major revisions every decade or so. The latest version runs to more than 1,000 pages. And while the MUTCD doesn't get much attention outside of transportation circles, it has a major impact.

"It is the most important pedestrian safety document that you have never heard of," said Mike McGinn, the executive director of America Walks and a former mayor of Seattle.

First changes in over a decade

Safety advocates have been urging federal officials to make the manual friendlier to pedestrians and cyclists in the first major revisions to the document since 2009.

"The old version of the manual really reflected a prioritization of moving vehicles through the community fast, rather than the safety of people," McGinn said.

The public weighed in with more than 100,000 comments during the latest round of revisions, and federal officials say they're listening.

"We're trying to find the best path forward that prioritizes safety," said Shailen Bhatt, the Federal Highway Administrator.

"When we built the interstate system back in the 50s and 60s, the predominant thinking was how do we move cars and trucks," Bhatt said. Today the thinking has broadened, he said, to "a focus on moving people. And reflecting how these roads, streets and highways are also parts of the very communities that we live in."

Bhatt says the latest version of the manual includes some major changes that advocates wanted. For example, the bicycle section is twice as large as it was in the previous edition.

"I do a lot of cycling with my family, my two young daughters," Bhatt said. "We want to make bicycling safer."

Heavy traffic moves along a freeway in Chicago, Illinois, on November 21, 2023. Kamil Krzaczynski/AFP via Getty Images

Kamil Krzaczynski/AFP via Getty Images

A fight over the 85th percentile rule

Advocates were also pushing for major changes to how speed limits are set. They urged federal officials to get rid of the so-called 85th percentile rule, the standard that's often used to set speed limits at or below the rate that 85% of people will drive with open roads and favorable conditions.

Critics of the rule say it encourages traffic engineers to hike speed limits to levels that are unsafe, especially when pedestrians and cyclists are added to the mix.

The latest version of the MUTCD puts less emphasis on the 85th percentile rule — but doesn't get rid of it altogether.

"What we're saying is, yes, you need to look at the speeds that are on the roadway," Bhatt said. "But that is not the only factor. We want you to consider other factors as well: The context of the road, the other users of the road. Is there any crash history on the roadway?"

But that approach disappointed some safety advocates.

"It's a small step in the right direction, but there's a lot more that could be done," said Cathy Chase, the president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety. "We know that speeding is a big factor in crashes, and we were really hoping to see them devalue that rule or get rid of it completely."

Bhatt defends the choice to keep the 85th percentile rule as a factor. He says the manual has to serve the entire country, not just urban and suburban areas where safety advocates are most focused.

"We got 100,000 comments. Some people said take [the 85th percentile rule] out entirely. Other people said, give us even more ability to solely use it," Bhatt said. "What we're trying to do with this document is to tell people that we're giving you some flexibility."

Safety advocates wanted more

Safety advocates worry that this approach makes it too easy for traffic engineers to stay with the status quo.

"It really has a powerful effect on traffic engineers who feel they have to do what the manual says, or they're putting their city at risk of losing money" through lawsuits if there's a crash on the road, said Mike McGinn.

Before he was mayor of Seattle, McGinn worked as a neighborhood activist, and says traffic engineers often used the MUTCD to block changes that safety advocates were seeking.

"My experiences as a local street advocate was being told by traffic engineers, 'sorry, you can't have that, the manual doesn't allow it,'" he said.

McGinn had also hoped the new manual would make it easier for local safety activists to request changes in their neighborhoods. "We wanted to make it a lot easier to get signals and crosswalks and the types of street design elements that would slow down vehicles," he said.

The latest revisions to the manual are a move in the right direction, McGinn said. But they stop short of what he and other advocates were hoping to see.

"We're looking at the greatest rate of pedestrian deaths that we've seen in decades right now," he said. "So it feels like that wasn't transformational enough."

Adblock test (Why?)


Federal roadbuilding manual gets an update - NPR
Read More

How McDonald's, Chipotle, Starbucks are preparing for the fast-food worker battles to come in 2024 - CNBC

In this article

Scott Olson | Getty Images News | Getty Images

There will be no fooling California fast-food workers come April 1. That's the day they can honestly believe the minimum wage in the Golden State will jump to $20 an hour from $16, and only in that sector.

The pay raise exclusive for that workforce, estimated at more than 500,000, is the centerpiece of Assembly Bill 1228, a compromise law hammered out last summer by fast-food companies, the Service Employees International Union and Governor Gavin Newsom's administration. All three sides hailed the negotiated outcome, though the industry knows the alternative could have been calamitous.

AB 1228 overrode a previously passed — and highly contentious — bill, AB 257, that would have raised the hourly minimum to $22, created a Fast Food Council with authority to mandate working conditions and imposed a joint-employer rule making franchisors liable for franchisees' infractions. And in the process, the industry and the SEIU each saved millions earmarked to lobby voters on a November ballot referendum to decide the matter.

"Anyone looking at this in the industry, now that emotion has been removed from the negotiation, sees this as the least bad option or worst good option, depending on which side you're on," said Matt Haller, president and CEO of the International Franchise Association, a trade group that represents franchisors, franchisees and franchise suppliers. In exchange for concessions, and staring down a very uncertain outcome on the referendum, "We have this very predictable business environment for our members moving forward," he said.

Although they dodged some bigger bullets, McDonald's, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Starbucks, Yum! Brands' Taco Bell, Shake Shack, El Pollo Loco, In-N-Out Burger and other fast-food chains — operating nearly 30,000 franchised and company-owned restaurants in California — are nonetheless busy strategizing how to mitigate the certain bump in their labor costs.

They're also dealing with the likelihood that an energized SEIU will step up its long-standing goal of unionizing fast-food workers, something the industry has thus far mostly avoided, while simultaneously keeping a wary eye out for similar minimum wage legislation and union organizing efforts in other states.

The overwhelming, and unsurprising, response from franchisors is that they plan to raise menu prices, a tactic they've been using lately to contend with inflation, higher interest rates and supply-chain costs and previous wage increases triggered by the success of the nationwide Fight for $15 movement launched a decade ago. "They're still figuring out how much, but we know everyone is going to increase prices," said Brian Harbour, an industry analyst at Morgan Stanley, noting, however, that franchisees generally have discretion on the prices they charge.

Indeed, when Harbour asked McDonald's executives, during the company's third-quarter earnings call in October, about possible price increases post-1228, CEO Chris Kempczinski said, "There is going to be a wage impact for our California franchisees. I don't think, at this point, we can say exactly how much…. Certainly, there's going to be some element of that, that does need to be worked through with higher pricing." The world's largest fast-food chain, McDonald's has 9% of its nearly 13,500 U.S. locations in California, most of them franchises.

That sentiment was echoed by Chipotle, which operates about 460 company-owned locations in California. "We have not made a decision to raise prices in California to offset the anticipated labor increase in California next year," said a company spokesperson in an email to CNBC, "but our CFO, Jack Hartung, said on the Q3 earnings call that we are studying it and anticipate we would need to increase prices mid-to-high single digits, (i.e. mid is 4-5-6% and high is 7-8-9%), and that means prices will be that much higher as a percentage."

Other recent earnings calls have elicited similar remarks. "We will rely on pricing," said Jack in the Box CEO Darin Harris, anticipating a rise in menu prices between 6% and 8%. How consumers react to this latest round of price hikes, he added, raises uncertainty in the chain's sales projections for the coming year.

"Everybody who's doing business in California, and is subject to this new mandate, is going to [raise prices]," Haller said, adding that the consensus is in the 10% range. "The question is, how far can you take price until you turn off your value [to customers]?"

Order kiosks, drive-thru chatbots and automation

Beyond increasing prices, California's fast-food restaurant operators are exploring other measures to counterbalance the wage hike, such as automating certain tasks as a way to increase workers' efficiency and productivity and potentially eliminate some jobs altogether. For example, automated drink dispensers and robotic burger flippers are being tested around the country. Chipotle, Starbucks and Sweetgreen are experimenting with automated food and beverage preparation systems.

Earlier this year, Wendy's began testing generative AI chatbots to take drive-thru orders and is now offering the human-free technology to all its franchisees, including nearly 300 in California. Among others jumping on the chatbot bandwagon are Carl's Jr., Hardee's, Del Taco, McDonald's and Sonic Drive-In.

Inside fast-food restaurants, self-order kiosks are trending after nearly a decade of testing by Panera Bread, McDonald's and Burger King. Yum Brands, the owner of fast-food chains KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut and The Habit, is aggressively installing them. "On average, kiosk sales see 10% higher checks compared with front counter sales and excellent profit flow-through," Yum CEO David Gibbs told investors in August.

During El Pollo Loco's November earnings call, interim president and CEO Maria Hollandsworth reported positive tests with kiosks, "resulting in reduced restaurant-level labor hours per day," she said. Along with rolling them out across the chain, she said the company is also "driving labor efficiency" with new salsa processing equipment and is testing "additional initiatives, such as automated dishwashers."

By definition, automation minimizes human input, a reality the SEIU hopes won't overly affect California's fast-food workers as a result of AB 1228. "We're hopeful the companies genuinely appreciate the value and the contributions of their workforce as part of the customer experience," said Joseph Bryant, international vice president of the SEIU. "It's on all of our minds what will be the impact of this next wave of technology, driven by AI, and at the end of the day, I don't think anybody thinks it's a better experience to deal with pads versus people."

The impact of the new law is already being felt by some workers in California directly, with Pizza Hut saying this week it would lay off 1,200 delivery drivers as a result of the new minimum wage, a strategy that could benefit delivery companies such as DoorDash and Uber.

Fast-food workers and unionization

Regardless, the time is ripe to accelerate union organizing among fast-food workers in California and possibly beyond, Bryant said, citing not only the passage of 1228 but also growing support for unions across the country. According to recent polling by Gallup, 67% of Americans approve of labor unions, the highest reading since the 1960s. "In general, there is a different kind of perception or appreciation into what the labor movement means, what labor unions do, particularly as the wealth gap in this country continues to grow," Bryant said.

Conversely, only about 10% of all U.S. workers are unionized, and barely 1% of fast-food workers. The glaring outlier is Starbucks, with employees at nearly 370 of its company-owned stores electing for unionization. Still, that leaves more than 16,000 Starbucks nonunionized. Starbucks recently said it wants to resume talks with union representatives early next year.

Bryant acknowledged that the disparity between union support and actual membership is an impediment to organizing fast-food workers in California and other states. He's hopeful that AB 1228 could provide some momentum, but also admitted that companies won't make it easy. "Even looking at 1228, [they] spent millions to defeat those efforts," he said.

Haller said he has no doubt that the SEIU will capitalize on the 1228 outcome. "They continue to target us in California as well as other states through policy change to advance their political goals, which are to organize workers and add market share," he said. Yet he looks at their failed efforts to unionize fast-food workers as an affirmation of the franchising model. "We think that's a good thing," Haller said. "That's not an anti-union comment, it's a positive franchising comment."

AB 1228 also presents a chance for some fast-food companies to increase market share in California. "Longer term, what we've been talking about with our franchisees is this is an opportunity for us to gain share," McDonald's Kempczinski said to analysts. "We believe we're in a better position than our competitors to weather this."

Other major fast-fooders have expressed similar optimism, Harbour said. "The thinking is, we can better afford to take wages up and also have tools or equipment that can provide some productivity to offset wage increases," he said.

Haller concurred with that viewpoint. "The big companies are more well-positioned to gain market share, [as are] the big franchisees," he said, "by buying or acquiring underperforming locations or franchisees that may have been thinking about an exit in the coming years."

On the flip side, Haller said, "We are also going to see brands that want to develop in California now choose not to, because it becomes difficult to find first-time owners who can actually monetize a business focused on value, with some of these cost pressures."

In the long term, although fast-food companies will initially have to invest more in labor and technology, "The fact that they're committed to increasing pricing to offset some of that impact has probably assuaged investors' concern," Harbour said. What's more, the earnings of the major chains are at or close to all-time highs, he said, so AB 1228 "doesn't seem to be worrying people too much."

Adblock test (Why?)


How McDonald's, Chipotle, Starbucks are preparing for the fast-food worker battles to come in 2024 - CNBC
Read More

Saturday, December 30, 2023

Hurricanes' Jesper Fast leaves game vs. Maple Leafs with upper-body injury, will not return - Daily Faceoff

Carolina Hurricanes’ forward Jesper Fast left Saturday’s game vs. the Toronto Maple Leafs after taking a hit from forward Noah Gregor. The Hurricanes would later announce on social media that Fast suffered an upper-body injury and would not return to the game.

The incident occurred in the first period after Fast, 32, took a hit from Gregor in the Hurricanes’ zone. Fast struggled to get off the ice following the hit, and ended up going into concussion protocol.

Through 36 games in the 2023-24 regular season, Fast has four goals and seven assists for 11 points. In four seasons with the Hurricanes, Fast has 34 goals and 59 assists for 93 points in 244 games.

Now in his 11th season, Fast has 89 goals, 151 assists for 240 points in 666 games with the Hurricanes and the New York Rangers. He scored a career-high 34 points with the Hurricanes in the 2021-22 season, scoring 14 goals and 20 assists.

At the end of two periods, the Hurricanes were leading the Maple Leafs by a score of 2-0. Going into the game, the Hurricanes had a 19-13-4 record with 42 points, good for fourth in the Eastern Conference’s Metropolitan Division.

Carolina won two straight, having beaten the Nashville Predators 5-2 last Wednesday and the Montreal Canadiens 5-3 last Thursday.

The Maple Leafs went into Saturday’s game with a 17-9-7 record and 41 points, good for third in the Atlantic Division. They had lost two straight, including a 4-2 defeat by the Ottawa Senators last Wednesday and a 6-5 overtime loss to the Columbus Blue Jackets on Friday night.

Adblock test (Why?)


Hurricanes' Jesper Fast leaves game vs. Maple Leafs with upper-body injury, will not return - Daily Faceoff
Read More

Friday, December 29, 2023

I Tried 6 Of The Cheapest Fast Food Burgers From Canadian Chains & 1 Sandwich Easily Wins - Narcity Canada

This Opinion article is part of a Narcity Media series. The views expressed are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Narcity Media.

Fast food is a delicious option for when you need a quick meal, but times are also tough and the cost of food is super high, so we decided to test out the cheapest burgers you can get at some of Canada's fast food chains to see which sandwiches are worth it.

After doing some research, I settled on comparing burgers from Wendy's, A&W, Harvey's, McDonald's, Dairy Queen and Burger King and the difference between the quality of the sandwiches is pretty vast.

While all of the restaurants offer much fancier options like their signature sandwiches that'll cost you upwards of $5, for this comparison, I looked up the sandwich that cost the least out of all of their offerings, with almost all of them coming in at under $3 other than Dairy Queen.

In terms of ranking, I'll be giving each burger a rating out of 5 in terms of how much I enjoyed it, and there's one I'm going to start picking up much more often!

McDonald's Hamburger

A hand with blue nail polish holding a hamburger against a white wall.

Sarah holding a hamburger from McDonald's.

Sarah Rohoman | Narcity

McDonald's is by far my favourite fast food place to grab a sandwich (and their breakfast wraps are amongst my favourite out of all the options out there), but the McDonald's hamburger is kind of rough.

It's kind of just a sad little dry puck of a burger with very little substance to it, and quite frankly, it's not worth the money — there are much better options on their menu, but if you're trying to spend as little as possible, you'll want to hit up a different fast food joint's value picks.

Rating: 0.5/5

Price: $2.61

Wendy's Jr. Hamburger Deluxe

A hand with blue nail polish holding a hamburger against a white wall.

Sarah holding Wendy's Jr. Hamburger Deluxe.

Sarah Rohoman | Narcity

Out of all the burgers I tried, Wendy's Jr. Hamburger Deluxe is the only one that had fresh veg, which I found to be a pleasant surprise, but unfortunately, it overwhelms the burgers.

The patty itself isn't quite as dry as McDonald's offering, but it lacks any kind of flavour, so all you're really getting is the sharpness of the onion and the tartness of the tomato.

I also found the bread to be a little too much for such a small patty, but that can be solved by taking the top bun off, if you'd like.

Rating: 1/5

Price: $2.19

Harvey's Jr. Burger

A hand with blue nail polish holding a hamburger against a white wall.

Sarah holding a Harvey's Jr. Burger.

Sarah Rohoman | Narcity

Harvey's Jr. Burger falls quite solidly into "eh, it's okay" territory, but I did really like their bun which seems to have been toasted a bit, unlike the others which were just soft.

The patty itself tastes like a proper hamburger should, but it does kind of taste like a frozen burger that you buy from the grocery store to grill at your cottage.

As well, the condiments sort of took over the flavour for the most part, but it's not the worst problem to have for this particular sandwich.

Rating: 2/5

Price: $2.93

A&W's Buddy Burger

A hand with blue nail polish holding a hamburger against a white wall.

Sarah holding A&W's Buddy Burger.

Sarah Rohoman | Narcity

A&W's Buddy Burger was definitely the most unique out of all of the burgers I tried and it threw some curveballs at me that I truly did not anticipate as I'd never had one of them before.

In my first bite, I was surprised to find cooked onions, which were delicious but somewhat overpowering. As well, I didn't expect there to be mayonnaise, but when I looked it up later, it turned out what I thought was mayo was, in fact, "Teen sauce," a condiment whose ingredients continue to elude me.

Like some of the others, there was too much bun for this burger, so while I do think this sandwich is pretty nice, the bread situation combined with the overwhelming onions gives it just above a passing grade.

Rating: 3/5

Price: $2.93

Dairy Queen's Original Cheeseburger Signature Stackburger

A hand with blue nail polish holding a hamburger against a white wall.

Dairy Queen's Original Cheeseburger Signature Stackburger

Sarah Rohoman | Narcity

I don't often think of Dairy Queen when I think of burgers, but during my research I discovered that the brand does make sandwiches (and poutine!) so I added it to my list.

The cheapest option they have on their menu is a cheeseburger, which was a welcome departure from all the hamburgers I had, and while the individual sandwich came in at the highest price point of the day, you can actually get two of them for $6 (without tax) which is a pretty good deal.

This burger was quite a bit more substantial than the others and could work as a meal, whereas the others I would classify more as a snack.

It tasted freshly grilled, the cheese added some nice richness and the pickles, mustard and ketchup were all nicely balanced.

A solid option, particularly if you're hungry and want to grab two!

Rating: 4/5

Price: $5.30

Burger King's Hamburger

A hand with blue nail polish holding a hamburger against a white wall.

Sarah holding Burger King's Hamburger.

Sarah Rohoman | Narcity

And taking the gold medal among cheap fast food sandwiches is Burger King's Hamburger!

I don't usually stop at Burger King when I'm out, so I'm very grateful this taste test reintroduced the brand to me.

The flavour of the patty is what makes Burger King's offering really stand out. It has a nice and smokey flavour like it's been grilled over some kind of flame and the pickles add the perfect amount of acidity to the flavour.

I was also kind of tickled by the presence of the poppy seeds on the bun, which none of the others had — sometimes it's the little details that make the difference!

Overall, this is a no-nonsense, yummy hamburger, and at $2.61, it's also at a pretty good price point.

Rating: 5/5

Price: $2.61

If you're looking to add some poutine to your fast food takeout order, I also recently tested out poutines from popular Canadian chains, and the winner of the experiment tuned out to be a restaurant that I didn't actually know sold the dish prior to my research!

These prices are confirmed at the time of publishing, but they can change at any time. Taxes and fees may not be included.

From Your Site Articles

Adblock test (Why?)


I Tried 6 Of The Cheapest Fast Food Burgers From Canadian Chains & 1 Sandwich Easily Wins - Narcity Canada
Read More

Thursday, December 28, 2023

Supreme Court Urged to Move Fast on Trump's Ballot Eligibility - The New York Times

The Colorado Republican Party asked the justices to decide its appeal by Super Tuesday. The voters who won in the Colorado Supreme Court want to move even faster.

The Supreme Court was asked on Thursday to fast-track its review of the stunning Colorado Supreme Court ruling that former President Donald J. Trump was ineligible to appear on the state’s primary ballot.

The request was made by the six voters who won in the state court, which ruled that Mr. Trump was subject to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. That provision bars officials who promised to support the Constitution from holding office again after engaging in insurrection.

The voters also told the justices that they would not oppose review of that decision.

There are cases pending in several states challenging Mr. Trump’s eligibility on the same grounds. A definitive ruling by the Supreme Court would apply nationwide and settle the matter.

The voters’ request to accelerate the case came the day after the Colorado Republican Party asked the justices to review the state court’s ruling. Mr. Trump has not filed a promised petition seeking review of the ruling, and his general practice has been to move as slowly as possible in the legal proceedings against him.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Adblock test (Why?)


Supreme Court Urged to Move Fast on Trump's Ballot Eligibility - The New York Times
Read More

US investment concerns in China are rising. Except for fast food - The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — There’s been no shortage of tough news for China’s economy as some of the world’s biggest brands consider or take action to shift manufacturing to friendlier shores at a time of unease about security controls, protectionism and wobbly relations between Beijing and Washington.

Count Adidas, Apple and Samsung among those looking elsewhere.

But as a tumultuous 2023 for the Chinese economy comes to a close, there has been at least one bright spot for Beijing when it comes to foreign investment: American fast-food chains have decided a market of 1.4 billion people is simply too delicious to pass up.

KFC China’s parent company opened its 10,000th restaurant in China this month and aims to have stores within reach of half of China’s population by 2026. McDonald’s is planning to open 3,500 new stores in China over the next four years. And Starbucks invested $220 million in a manufacturing and distribution facility in eastern China, its biggest project outside the U.S.

This is surely not what Chinese President Xi Jinping had in mind as he made the case to American CEOs about the upside of China’s “super-large market” last month while he was in San Francisco for a summit of world leaders. The investments in fast food and other consumer goods, while Washington is curbing exports of computer chips and other advanced technology, don’t fit into China’s own blueprint for modernizing its economy.

“As you try to interpret the signals from McDonald’s and Starbucks” and other chains, says Phil Levy, chief economist at the supply chain management firm Flexport, “note what the industries are: These are not high-tech burgers.’’

And while some U.S. companies are increasing investments in the world’s second-largest economy, overall foreign investment began falling this year. In the July-September quarter, net foreign direct investment in China sank to a deficit of $11.8 billion, the first quarterly deficit since Beijing began publishing the data in 1998.

As tensions simmer between China and its Western trading partners, many multinational companies are shifting investments to other places, such as Southeast Asia or India, or repatriating their earnings. That has sapped China of a key engine when its economy has yet to fully recover from the disruptions of the pandemic and a property industry crisis that has been a drag on growth.

Beijing puts some of the blame on U.S. government policies.

Commerce Ministry spokesperson Shu Jueting said recently, “The U.S. side has repeatedly politicized economic, trade and technology issues and overstretched the concept of security, abused export control measures, and restricted trade and investment in China by its own enterprises, which is forcing enterprises to give up opportunities in the Chinese market and opportunities for win-win cooperation.”

A survey released in September by the U.S.-China Business Council, which represents American companies in China, suggested that the uncertainty has taken a toll: 43% of its members said China’s business environment had deteriorated in the past year, and 83% said they were less optimistic about China than they had been three years ago. Twenty-one percent said they were investing fewer resources in China, versus just 10% who were investing more.

Surveys of European and Japanese companies have shown similar results.

While China’s market is gigantic, it’s ailing. Unemployment among young Chinese rose to over 20% by June, the last time the government released that data. Housing prices are falling and the stock market is down nearly 15% since the summer. That’s left many Chinese feeling nervous about spending.

Still, bullishness for China as other industries try to de-risk and detangle from Beijing may be a profit-increasing strategy for the fast-food industry.

“We believe there is no better time to simplify our structure, given the tremendous opportunity to capture increased demand and further benefit from our fastest-growing market’s long-term potential,” McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski said as the Chicago-based company announced in November it was increasing its minority 20% ownership of its McDonald’s licensed stores in China, Macau and Hong Kong to 48%.

Burgers and lattes don’t raise the sorts of friction that more high-tech industries have in the complicated U.S.-China relationship. Those strains have persisted under the presidency of Joe Biden, who took office vowing to do more to counter China’s expanding military clout and its menacing of neighbors, to improve the country’s treatment of Uyghur and other ethnic minorities, and to crack down on intellectual property theft.

Relations hit a low point in February when Biden ordered a Chinese spy balloon that traversed the continental United States to be shot down. Beijing, which claims self-governed Taiwan as its own territory, also protested a stopover in the U.S. by the island’s president, Tsai Ing-wen, earlier this year. China answered fresh U.S. controls on exports of advanced computer chips and the technology to make them with limits of its own on exports of vital commodities like graphite, gallium and germanium, all metals used in making semiconductors, solar panels, missiles and radar.

The relationship appears to be stabilizing somewhat as 2023 winds down, highlighted by last month’s Biden and Xi meeting outside San Francisco. But since then, Biden’s top advisers have said there are no plans to shift the strategy of tightening regulations and blocking U.S.-based high-tech investments in China, citing the need to safeguard national security.

Both former President Donald Trump, the 2024 GOP presidential front-runner, and Biden have worried about depending on China, a potential adversary, for supplies of critical materials used in many high-tech products. Both have sought to reduce America’s reliance on Chinese factories and have encouraged companies to shift away from China to other countries — so-called “friend-shoring.”

Still, Biden administration officials have said they don’t want to see a total decoupling of the world’s two biggest economies.

“De-risking, yes. Decoupling, no,” Nicholas Burns, the U.S. ambassador to China, said at a recent event in Washington. “We want to continue a major trade and investment relationship with China, just not ... in the realm that might help them leapfrog over us sometime in the next 10 years in military technology.”

Rosemary Coates, executive director of the nonprofit Reshoring Institute, noted that decisions to expand or retrench are relatively easy for a company like McDonald’s or its fast-food rivals.

Franchises “can be opened or closed,” Coates said. “It’s not like you’re investing in an auto plant or some kind of machine shop.”

China’s vast market is vital for many foreign companies: At their annual investors day gathering this month, McDonald’s executives noted that 70 million of the 150 million customers active in its customer loyalty program are in China.

KFC China says growth in its new outlets has averaged more than 22% over the last five years, and it plans to open 1,200 additional stores in the next three years. The chain Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen relaunched its brand in China in August with a flagship restaurant in Shanghai and plans to open 1,700 stores over the next 10 years.

But for all the promise of China’s huge market, U.S. businesses have other reasons to think twice about expanding in China.

In July, the U.S. recommended Americans reconsider traveling to China because of arbitrary law enforcement and exit bans and the risk of wrongful detentions. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has warned Chinese leaders that U.S. businesses might stop investing in their country if they do not address complaints about worsening conditions due to raids on firms, unexplained fines and unpredictable official behavior.

While insisting that China is keen to have foreign investment, Beijing has given no indication it might change trade, market access and other policies that irk Washington and its other trading partners.

“Where do you draw the line?’’ asked Levy, a former White House economic adviser in George W. Bush’s administration. “Someone might say: For sourcing sensitive computer chips, this has to be done in a place I really trust. … The other extreme is: We’re OK selling them lattes and burgers. But where do you draw the line for the stuff in between — say, automotive parts? What about ball bearings?’’

___

Kurtenbach reported from Bangkok. AP writer Ken Moritsugu contributed to this report from Beijing.

Adblock test (Why?)


US investment concerns in China are rising. Except for fast food - The Associated Press
Read More

A new 'report' from McDonald's could change the fast-food chain forever — here's what to expect - Yahoo News

According to reporting from the Wall Street Journal, McDonald’s is prepared to “release a report next year examining the pros and cons of reusable packaging in its restaurants worldwide.”

McDonald’s has commissioned studies and reports on this subject in the past and even made a commitment in 2018 to use 100% renewable, recycled, or certified sources for its packaging by 2025. However, the company is not there yet, and there is no guarantee that it will actually meet its stated goal.

Luckily, there is one tried and true method of convincing corporations to stop using single-use plastics: forcing them to do so by changing the laws.

There is no doubt that single-use plastics have become a pollution crisis with devastating impacts on our planet. In recent years, investors, governments, and the public have begun to pressure corporations that flood oceans and landfills with plastic waste to find and implement alternatives.

McDonald’s has already changed its practices in France and Germany in response to stricter laws in those countries governing the use of single-use plastics in restaurants. In France, McDonald’s has to serve all on-site meals in reusable containers, and in Germany, it has to provide reusable containers on request.

Since the company has continued operations in both of those countries, the restrictions clearly have not been so onerous as to make the selling of fast food economically non-viable. That is to say, McDonald’s can — and does, when forced — stop using plastic packaging while continuing to make money.

A similar restriction on single-use plastics was recently passed in England. India has also passed a similar law.

McDonald’s will release its report at some point and will likely make some promises about its practices going forward. But, as France, Germany, and others have shown, these changes have often only come when the law requires them.

Join our free newsletter for cool news and actionable info that makes it easy to help yourself while helping the planet.

Adblock test (Why?)


A new 'report' from McDonald's could change the fast-food chain forever — here's what to expect - Yahoo News
Read More

Wednesday, December 27, 2023

Why The Navy Never Built Deep Diving and Fast Titanium Submarines Like Russia - The National Interest Online

Why no titanium submarines like the U.S. Navy? Following the end of the Cold War, titanium became the "go-to" material of choice for many high-end consumer products – notably bicycles, golf clubs, tennis rackets, and even skis. The strength-to-weight ratio made titanium a great material choice in the sporting goods market where weight reduction was beneficial. Not only could the equipment with a low density improve the performance of athletes, but titanium could allow it to last longer.

Moreover, titanium had a high corrosion resistance, low level of elasticity, and tolerance to scratch and damage.

Given such properties, there is the question of why the United States Navy didn't follow the lead of the Soviet Union and attempt to employ the metal for its nuclear-powered submarines. The answer is a bit complex and really came down to the fact that the U.S. was late to understanding its potential.

Titanium: Readily Available

Despite the fact that titanium is one of the most abundant metals found in the earth's crust, throughout the Cold War period it was considered a strategic material by the U.S. government. A large stockpile of titanium sponge – a porous form of the pure metal – was even maintained by the Defense National Stockpile Center, until the stockpile was dispersed in the 2000s.

In the 1950s and 1960s, the Soviet Union pioneered the use of titanium in military applications, notably in its submarine program.

As Dr. Brent Eastwood noted for The National Interest, "Titanium alloy is usually stronger than steel but weighs half as less. It is more expensive, up to three to five times more than steel. Titanium is also less corrosive in salt water. It can handle more pressure during deeper dives – all the way down to 2,200 feet. Fashioning titanium to make a hull is no easy feat. Welding is difficult and the slightest mistake during the welding phase could make the titanium brittle and less strong. Welders did their jobs in expensive facilities that had argon gas, making for dangerous work."

The U.S. Navy considered creating its own supply chain for titanium but determined the effort and cost would not be worth it. That might seem odd given that titanium is used today as a pigment in house paint. But back in the early 1960s, it was practically unobtainium.

We need to remember that the United States Air Force's SR-71 "Blackbird" was the first U.S. aircraft to utilize titanium alloy in the airframe. Along with its low weight, titanium was the only material that could provide the durability of stainless steel at excessive temperatures.

However, the United States didn't have any major sources of the metal, nor did any U.S. allies. That is somewhat ironic as it turns out that titanium is the ninth most abundant element on Earth. It is almost always present in igneous rocks and the sediments derived from them. It occurs in the minerals ilmenite, rutile, and sphene and is present in titanates and many iron ores.

The issue was complicated by the fact that while it was fairly common, the Soviet Union pioneered its use in military and submarine applications. Seeing its potential, the U.S. government sought to obtain as much of the lightweight material as possible, declaring it a strategic metal and creating that stockpile.

In fact, much of the titanium used in the SR-71 ended up being sourced from the same nation the aircraft was used to spy on – namely the Soviet Union. The raw materials were bought from third-world countries and fake companies set up by the CIA.

"The airplane is 92% titanium inside and out. Back when they were building the airplane the United States didn’t have the ore supplies – an ore called rutile ore. It's a very sandy soil and it’s only found in very few parts of the world. The major supplier of the ore was the USSR. Working through Third World countries and bogus operations, they were able to get the rutile ore shipped to the United States to build the SR-71," former SR-71 pilot Colonel Rich Graham told the BBC in 2013.

It wasn't just obtaining the titanium that was an issue for the designers of the high-speed aircraft. There was also a very valid concern that the use of cadmium-plated steel tools could weaken the body of the aircraft if mishandled, which meant that even new tools had to be designed and fabricated. 

Those, too, were made from titanium.

Is There More to the Submarine Story?

As Eastwood also noted, "The Russian boats were fast because of the titanium but they were not as quiet as advertised. The Americans felt that titanium was not worth the trouble and cost."

It should be added that all welding of titanium must be done in an inert atmosphere of argon or helium to shield it from contamination with atmospheric gases, including oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen. Contamination causes a variety of conditions, such as embrittlement, which reduces the integrity of the assembly welds and leads to joint failure.

The Soviets may have been willing to risk the safety of the crews on board its submarines – as noted by its numerous submarine accidents – but the United States Navy certainly wasn't. Titanium thus didn't become the metal of choice then and still isn't employed for U.S. submarines.

However, during the Cold War, we can speculate that another issue was that the CIA was already struggling to obtain the metal for the SR-71. Simply put, it likely would have been difficult – if not impossible – for the agency to purchase enough titanium for the U.S. Navy without alerting Moscow in the process.

The answer to why the U.S. Navy didn't build titanium submarines could be that it was meant to help maintain the secrecy and security of the SR-71.

Author Experience and Expertise

Peter Suciu is a Michigan-based writer. He has contributed to more than four dozen magazines, newspapers, and websites with over 3,200 published pieces over a twenty-year career in journalism. He regularly writes about military hardware, firearms history, cybersecurity, politics, and international affairs. Peter is also a Contributing Writer for Forbes and Clearance Jobs. You can follow him on Twitter: @PeterSuciu.

Adblock test (Why?)


Why The Navy Never Built Deep Diving and Fast Titanium Submarines Like Russia - The National Interest Online
Read More

‘Anchors in our landscapes’: secular Scotland is fast losing its churches - The Guardian

At first sight the lichen-covered sandstone slab seems to be a doorstep for Morham church in East Lothian. Yet four rusting iron rings set into the stone hint at the slab’s true purpose.

Once the slab is lifted by those four iron rings, stairs lead down into a crypt which hold the remains of some pivotal figures in Scottish history. Their presence is delaying the sale of the church overhead, in a controversy that raises significant questions about the ramifications of one of the biggest property selloffs of modern times.

The Church of Scotland, once one of the most powerful forces in Scottish life, is disposing of hundreds of churches, manses, halls and cottages over the next five years as it faces up to a “perilous” transformation in its fortunes and its place in Scottish society.

Congregations are in steep decline, its clergy are ageing and its finances are in disarray. Like hundreds of other churches earmarked for sale, Morham church should be on the market but that has been halted by an unprecedented row over the fate of the nine people interred there more than 300 years ago.

Morham was once the family church of the Dalrymples, a dynasty that built Newhailes House, a Palladian mansion nearby. Interred in the crypt are the remains of Sir David Dalrymple, the lord advocate who oversaw the union of Scotland’s parliament with Westminster in 1707, and his grandson Lord Hailes, an eminent historian and contemporary of Adam Smith and David Hume.

Adam Fergusson, a former Conservative MEP descended from the Dalrymples, is preparing to take the church to court in February unless it drop its plans to disinter his ancestors and cremate them to clear the way for a sale. “I think the coffins should stay in the church, as their final resting place,” he said. “It’s setting a precedent.”

DJ Johnston-Smith, director of Scotland’s Churches Trust, at Morham parish church.

DJ Johnston-Smith, director of Scotland’s Churches Trust, believes there are up to a dozen similar situations around the country. “Scotland has changed remarkably in our lifetimes, in social attitudes and outlook,” he said. “But these building are anchors in our landscapes and in our collective history.”

The row at Morham illustrates a remarkable trend: the retreat of organised religion in Scotland. Churches of all denominations are being sold across Scotland as congregations dwindle, donations plunge and clerics retire.

The Church of Scotland’s property page advertises one of its most prominent churches in Inverness, the Old High Church, for offers over £150,000, with others in Ballachulish near Glen Coe, Orkney, Shetland, Edinburgh and, in Glasgow, St Columba’s, the city’s last Gaelic church.

The data suggests Scotland’s two largest Christian faiths, Presbyterianism and Catholicism, may be in terminal decline.

In 1982 the Church of Scotland had nearly 920,000 members; last year, that stood at 270,300, a decline of 70%. The average age of its congregants is now 62, and only 60,000 worship in person.

In 1982, the Catholic church conducted 4,870 marriages and had 273 men training to be priests. In 2021, there were just 812 Catholic marriages, with just 12 seminarians in training; it attracted only two new recruits this year. It no longer trains priests in Scotland and this year sold off its most famous seminary in Rome, the Pontifical Scots college, moving into another institution.

Until data from Scotland’s 2022 census is published next year, reliable figures on exactly how many people follow other faiths are hard to find but there are other indicators. Nonreligious marriages now far exceed religious in Scotland. Of the 30,033 marriages in Scotland last year, only 8,072 were religious (27%), compared with 9,140 Humanist and 12,821 civil ceremonies.

Prof Callum Brown, an expert on atheism and secularism at the University of Glasgow, believes Scotland has gone though a profound ethical shift and is very quickly becoming a secular country. Unlike other reformations, Scotland has not replaced its declining traditional religions with others.

Morham parish church and graveyard

The decline sped up in the 1970s, fuelled by women’s increasing equality and huge shifts in public attitudes to same-sex rights, abortion, contraception and the death penalty. “There’s been nothing like it in recorded history,” he said.

For decades, Scottish councils have been required by law to provide up to three seats on its education committees to unelected religious representatives who would vote on policy, even pushing through the closure of state schools.

Earlier in December, East Lothian council voted narrowly to remove its religious representatives, and an unelected trade union representative, from its education committee, mirroring similar votes in eight others, including Edinburgh, Stirling, Fife, Highlands, and Orkney Islands councils.

The Catholic church declined to discuss its situation but the crisis has led some to think the unthinkable. Lynne McNeil, editor of the Church of Scotland’s in-house magazine Life and Work, suggests in her latest editorial it could share churches with Catholics and Episcopalians. “In times of trial and challenge for many churches, minds need to be open to embrace new ways of being and working,” she said.

The Rt Rev Sally Foster-Fulton, the moderator of the Church of Scotland, told the Scotsman on Boxing Day the downsizing was “a challenge” but “also a real opportunity to reimagine ourselves and to let go of some of the baggage that’s held us down.

“Too many buildings is an energy-sapper. It’s a lot of energy to maintain a building, and if you don’t need it, and you can come together and work more effectively, why wouldn’t you? To embrace the challenges is something I’m keen we do. Not to deny them – not ever to deny them, because I think that’s naive, but also not to let that direct our fear.”

Adblock test (Why?)


‘Anchors in our landscapes’: secular Scotland is fast losing its churches - The Guardian
Read More

Walmart earnings: Grocery sales rise as fast food prices increase - CNBC

In this article WMT Follow your favorite stocks CREATE FREE ACCOUNT Getty Images (L) | Reuters (R) Forget the drive-...